Solution: Find two-digit numbers $x$ such that $x \equiv 4 \pmod{11}$. The numbers are $15, 26, 37, 48, 59, 70, 81, 92$. The smallest two-digit number is 15, but the question asks for "the" number, implying a unique answer. If constraints are missing, the answer could be the smallest, $oxed{15}$.

Solution: Find two-digit numbers $x$ such that $x \equiv 4 \pmod{11}$. The numbers are $15, 26, 37, 48, 59, 70, 81, 92$. The smallest two-digit number is 15, but the question asks for "the" number, implying a unique answer. If constraints are missing, the answer could be the smallest, $oxed{15}$.

["Finding Two-Digit Numbers $ x $ Such That $ x \equiv 4 \pmod{11} $ — The Unique Smallest Answer", "When solving modular arithmetic problems, one common question is identifying specific integers satisfying a given congruence. In this case, we focus on two-digit numbers $ x $ such that:", "$$\nx \equiv 4 \pmod{11}\n$$", "This congruence means that when $ x $ is divided by 11, the remainder is 4. All solutions to this congruence form an infinite arithmetic sequence:\n$$\nx = 11k + 4 \quad \ ext{for integer } k\n$$", "Now, we seek the two-digit numbers in this sequence. Let’s find all such numbers:", "- For $ k = 1 $: $ 11(1) + 4 = 15 $\n- $ k = 2 $: $ 11(2)+4 = 26 $\n- $ k = 3 $: $ 11(3)+4 = 37 $\n- $ k = 4 $: $ 11(4)+4 = 48 $\n- $ k = 5 $: $ 11(5)+4 = 59 $\n- $ k = 6 $: $ 11(6)+4 = 70 $\n- $ k = 7 $: $ 11(7)+4 = 81 $\n- $ k = 8 $: $ 11(8)+4 = 92 $\n- $ k = 9 $: $ 11(9)+4 = 103 $ (not two-digit)", "Among these, the valid two-digit numbers are:\n$$\n15, 26, 37, 48, 59, 70, 81, 92\n$$", "Though multiple solutions exist, the question asks for "the" number — a unique answer. Without additional constraints, the most reasonable interpretation is to select the smallest such number, since it represents the foundational solution in the sequence.", "Thus, the smallest two-digit number satisfying $ x \equiv 4 \pmod{11} $ is:", "$$\n\boxed{15}\n$$", "This number fits perfectly: $ 15 \div 11 = 1 $ remainder $ 4 $, satisfying the condition. Whether you seek uniqueness through minimality or context, $ \boxed{15} $ stands as the canonical answer."]

Related Articles

Trending Articles